Sammenligninger

Vi er ikke bange for at nævne navne.

Ærlige side-om-side sammenligninger med chatbot-aktørerne. Priser, funktioner, kontraktvilkår. Hvor vi vinder, hvor de vinder.

vs Intercom

vs Intercom Fin — same outcomes, 90% less spend

Intercom Fin is great for Fortune 500 with €200K customer support budgets. We're built for the other 99% — businesses that need the same outcomes without the enterprise contract.

Se sammenligningen
vs Tidio

vs Tidio — more languages, more tool calling, same price

Tidio is great for first-time chatbot buyers. We're built for businesses that outgrew it — needing real tool calling, more languages, and infrastructure that scales beyond e-commerce.

Se sammenligningen
vs Drift

vs Drift — same B2B playbook, without the €2,500/mo floor

Drift built the conversational marketing playbook. They also priced themselves out of reach for anyone under €5M ARR. We give you the same playbook at €89 / mo.

Se sammenligningen
vs Chatbase

vs Chatbase — same simplicity, real tool calling

Chatbase nailed 'paste your URL → get a chatbot'. We took the same UX and added tool calling so the bot actually does things — not just answers.

Se sammenligningen
vs Zendesk

vs Zendesk — same support outcomes, 10× less bloat

Zendesk built ticket-based support for the 2010s. We're built for the AI-first 2026 — where most queries should never become tickets in the first place.

Se sammenligningen
vs Crisp

vs Crisp — bot does more than reply

Crisp built a great live chat with bot features. We built a real AI agent with tool calling. If you need conversations to close deals (book, charge, schedule), pick us.

Se sammenligningen
vs LiveChat

vs LiveChat — AI-first vs human-first

LiveChat is built for human agents with bot as a fallback. We're built AI-first, with human handoff as the fallback. The economics flip 180 degrees: you scale conversations without scaling headcount.

Se sammenligningen
vs Olark

vs Olark — built for 2026, not 2014

Olark was great in 2014. The world moved to AI-first. We built what LiveChat would build if they started today — same outcomes, no legacy debt, transparent pricing.

Se sammenligningen
vs Smartsupp

vs Smartsupp — more tool calling, native multilingual

Smartsupp is solid for EU live chat with light bot features. We bring proper RAG, 45 languages natively, and tool calling that actually books and charges customers.

Se sammenligningen
vs Tawk.to

vs Tawk.to — free isn't always cheap

Tawk.to is free if you accept that the free user is the product. We charge €49 / mo and your data stays yours. Tool calling included. No ads. No upsells.

Se sammenligningen
vs HelpCrunch

vs HelpCrunch — AI-native vs CRM-bolted-chat

HelpCrunch built a CRM with a chat widget. We built AI conversations with CRM hooks. If the conversation is the product, we're built for it.

Se sammenligningen
vs Userlike

vs Userlike — GDPR-first vs GDPR-first, but AI-first

Userlike is the German GDPR-friendly live chat. We're the German-hosted GDPR-friendly AI agent. Same data residency advantage, with actual AI smarts and tool calling.

Se sammenligningen
vs Freshchat (Freshworks)

vs Freshchat — same outcomes, without the Freshworks bundle

Freshworks bundles Freshchat with Freshdesk + Freshsales. Great if you want their entire suite. We're standalone, integrate with anything, cost ~10× less.

Se sammenligningen
vs Pure Chat

vs Pure Chat — modern AI vs simple live chat

Pure Chat is simple, cheap, live chat. We're an AI agent with tool calling. If you want conversations to actually close deals — not just say 'we'll get back to you' — pick us.

Se sammenligningen
vs LivePerson

vs LivePerson — enterprise outcomes without enterprise sales

LivePerson is enterprise messaging at enterprise prices. We deliver 80% of their outcomes at 5% of the cost. Self-serve. No sales calls. No multi-year contracts.

Se sammenligningen
vs Botpress

vs Botpress — finished product vs build-your-own platform

Botpress is a developer platform — powerful, but you build everything. We're a finished receptionist that ships in 47 seconds. Pick us if you want the outcome; pick Botpress if you want the toolkit.

Se sammenligningen
vs ChatGPT (custom GPT)

vs ChatGPT — purpose-built vs general-purpose

ChatGPT custom GPT is great for a general assistant. We're purpose-built for business customer conversations: lead capture, tool calling, multi-channel, per-tenant data isolation, GDPR compliance.

Se sammenligningen
vs ManyChat

vs ManyChat — AI conversations vs scripted flows

ManyChat does scripted flows. We do real AI conversations. They're great for click-flow campaigns; we're great for actual conversations that resolve, book, and charge.

Se sammenligningen
vs ChatBot.com

vs ChatBot.com — AI-first vs script-first

ChatBot.com (LiveChat sibling) gives you a visual flow builder. We give you a finished AI agent that reads your website and answers. Less setup, more capability.

Se sammenligningen
vs Voiceflow

vs Voiceflow — finished receptionist vs voice platform

Voiceflow is a voice AI platform for builders. We're a finished AI agent with voice as one channel. Pick us if you want the outcome shipped; pick Voiceflow if you're building voice apps from scratch.

Se sammenligningen
vs Ada

vs Ada — same enterprise AI, without the enterprise contract

Ada delivers excellent enterprise AI deflection. They also gatekeep behind sales calls and 6-figure contracts. We deliver 80% of their capability self-serve at 1/100th of the price.

Se sammenligningen
vs Cresta

vs Cresta — AI customer-facing vs AI agent-assist

Cresta is brilliant at AI-augmented human agents (real-time coaching, suggestions). We're brilliant at AI-as-the-agent (deflection, autonomous resolution). Different problems. Often complementary.

Se sammenligningen
vs Forethought

vs Forethought — vertical-tuned vs generic AI deflection

Forethought is solid AI ticket deflection for support. We're an AI agent that handles full customer conversations end-to-end across industries. Different framing, broader scope.

Se sammenligningen
vs Dialogflow (Google)

vs Dialogflow — finished product vs Google AI infra

Dialogflow is Google Cloud's AI building blocks. Powerful but you assemble. We're a finished AI agent on top of OpenAI + Pinecone + n8n. Pick us if you want shipped; pick Dialogflow if you want to build.

Se sammenligningen
vs IBM Watson Assistant

vs Watson — 2026 AI vs 2018 enterprise platform

Watson Assistant was excellent for 2018-era enterprise NLU. The world moved to GPT-4-class models. We're built on the new stack — no migration debt, no IBM-licensing overhead.

Se sammenligningen
vs Microsoft Copilot Studio

vs Microsoft — agnostic vs Microsoft-stack-locked

Copilot Studio is great if you're 100% on Microsoft 365. We work with any stack — Google Workspace, Apple, Linux, whatever. Same outcomes, no Microsoft lock-in.

Se sammenligningen
vs Amazon Lex

vs Amazon Lex — finished UX vs AWS building blocks

Lex is AWS infrastructure for conversational interfaces. We're a finished AI agent with UI, dashboard, multi-channel, multi-tenant. Pick us for the UX; pick Lex if you want raw AWS primitives.

Se sammenligningen
vs Kore.ai

vs Kore.ai — modern AI vs legacy enterprise platform

Kore.ai is enterprise conversational AI platform. We deliver the same outcomes on modern AI stack (GPT-4 + Pinecone) self-serve, without the 6-month implementation.

Se sammenligningen
vs Yellow.ai

vs Yellow.ai — transparent SaaS vs enterprise platform

Yellow.ai (formerly Yellow Messenger) is comprehensive enterprise conversational AI. Sales-led. Enterprise-priced. We're transparent, self-serve, and 1/10 the cost — for SMBs that need real AI.

Se sammenligningen
vs Rasa

vs Rasa — finished product vs open-source toolkit

Rasa is the open-source NLU framework, brilliant if you have ML engineers. We're a hosted product that works in 47 seconds with no team required. Different audiences.

Se sammenligningen
vs HubSpot Chatbot

vs HubSpot — AI-first vs CRM-first

HubSpot Chatbot is a feature within HubSpot CRM. We're a standalone AI agent that integrates with HubSpot (and 80+ others). Pick us if AI conversation is the product; pick HubSpot if CRM is.

Se sammenligningen
vs Wati

vs Wati — multi-channel vs WhatsApp-only

Wati is excellent for WhatsApp Business. We do WhatsApp AND web AND voice AND Messenger AND Instagram from one brain. Same context across channels.

Se sammenligningen
vs Respond.io

vs Respond.io — AI conversations vs unified inbox

Respond.io built a great unified inbox for human agents across channels. We built an AI agent that handles those conversations end-to-end. Often complementary; sometimes a clean replacement.

Se sammenligningen
vs Sendbird

vs Sendbird — finished product vs developer SDK

Sendbird is messaging SDK for developers to embed chat in apps. We're a finished AI agent with our own SDK. Pick us if you want UX shipped; pick Sendbird if you're building custom chat.

Se sammenligningen
vs Verloop

vs Verloop — modern stack vs legacy enterprise

Verloop pioneered AI customer support automation for India/MENA. We bring modern GPT-4 stack with same regional sensitivity (Hindi, Arabic, more) at global pricing.

Se sammenligningen
vs Botsonic (Writesonic)

vs Botsonic — tool calling + vertical depth

Botsonic from Writesonic is a solid 'paste your URL, get a chatbot' tool. We're the same speed of deploy with real tool calling (Stripe, Cal, HubSpot) and vertical-tuned templates.

Se sammenligningen
vs CustomGPT.ai

vs CustomGPT — vertical depth + multi-channel

CustomGPT is a clean 'train AI on your docs' tool. We do that plus: vertical templates, tool calling, multi-channel, multi-tenant orgs, voice. Same starting price, more product.

Se sammenligningen

Se det selv.

14 dage gratis. Afbestil når som helst. Sammenlign i produktion, ikke i en demo.

14 days · no card · cancel anytime